IMCV vs. JGRO
IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and JGRO (JPMorgan Active Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while JGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. IMCV is passively managed, while JGRO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IMCV returned 16.05%/yr vs 21.66%/yr for JGRO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for JGRO.
Performance
IMCV vs. JGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than JGRO's 3.00% return.
IMCV
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
JGRO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMCV vs. JGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 9.75% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -1.17% |
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF | 3.00% | 14.71% | 32.77% | 37.74% | -10.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCV and JGRO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.58 |
The correlation between IMCV and JGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IMCV vs. JGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCV
JGRO
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
IMCV
JGRO
Energy
IMCV
JGRO
Industrials
IMCV
JGRO
Utilities
IMCV
JGRO
Technology
IMCV
JGRO
Consumer Defensive
IMCV
JGRO
Consumer Cyclical
IMCV
JGRO
Healthcare
IMCV
JGRO
Basic Materials
IMCV
JGRO
Real Estate
IMCV
JGRO
Communication Services
IMCV
JGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCV vs. JGRO — Risk / Return Rank
IMCV
JGRO
IMCV vs. JGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMCV | JGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.19 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 0.98 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.40 | 2.95 | +9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMCV | JGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.02 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.96 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
IMCV vs. JGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than JGRO's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and JGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCV | JGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -22.70% | -42.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -16.44% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.63% | -22.70% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -3.94% | +2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -4.85% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 5.45% | -3.60% |
Volatility
IMCV vs. JGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 2.35%, while JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCV | JGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 4.94% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 11.98% | -3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 15.82% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 19.94% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 19.94% | -0.28% |
IMCV vs. JGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than JGRO's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMCV vs. JGRO - Dividend Comparison
IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than JGRO's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.94% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMCV and JGRO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JGRO has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to IMCV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs JGRO's -22.70%.
On 3-year performance, JGRO leads with 21.66% vs 16.05% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JGRO has performed better with a 21.66% return vs 16.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JGRO.
IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.15% for JGRO.
IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while JGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.44% for JGRO.
IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCV and JGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer