PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGRO vs. JAVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGRO vs. JAVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than JAVA's 10.04% return.


JGRO

1D
-1.89%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
2.50%
6M
1.02%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
10Y*

JAVA

1D
-0.98%
1M
2.65%
YTD
10.04%
6M
9.09%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGRO vs. JAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
2.50%14.71%32.77%37.74%-10.43%
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
10.04%14.92%15.52%10.46%2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JGRO and JAVA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

0.65

The correlation between JGRO and JAVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

JGRO vs. JAVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JGRO
JAVA

Technology

47.2%
18.1%

Communication Services

12.8%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.4%

Healthcare

9.9%
12.3%

Industrials

8.7%
14.2%

Financial Services

4.8%
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
5.2%

Energy

1.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

0.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
3.2%

Utilities

0.1%
3.7%

Technology

JGRO
47.2%
JAVA
18.1%

Communication Services

JGRO
12.8%
JAVA
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JGRO
10.8%
JAVA
9.4%

Healthcare

JGRO
9.9%
JAVA
12.3%

Industrials

JGRO
8.7%
JAVA
14.2%

Financial Services

JGRO
4.8%
JAVA
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

JGRO
3.7%
JAVA
5.2%

Energy

JGRO
1.6%
JAVA
4.2%

Basic Materials

JGRO
0.3%
JAVA
3.0%

Real Estate

JGRO
0.2%
JAVA
3.2%

Utilities

JGRO
0.1%
JAVA
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGRO vs. JAVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRO
JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JAVA
JAVA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRO vs. JAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGROJAVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.86

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

10.52

-7.78

JGRO vs. JAVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the JAVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGRO and JAVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGRO vs. JAVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, which is greater than JAVA's maximum drawdown of -16.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and JAVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGROJAVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.70%

-16.54%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-8.29%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-16.54%

-6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-1.34%

-3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-3.60%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

2.25%

+3.26%

Volatility

JGRO vs. JAVA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) at 4.04%. This indicates that JGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGROJAVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

4.04%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

8.91%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

11.65%

+4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

14.82%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

14.82%

+5.17%

JGRO vs. JAVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JGRO and JAVA have an expense ratio of 0.44%.


Dividends

JGRO vs. JAVA - Dividend Comparison

JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than JAVA's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
1.23%1.34%1.45%1.65%1.25%0.48%
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
0.15%0.16%0.10%0.17%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGRO and JAVA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGRO has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to JAVA (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGRO dropped -22.70% vs JAVA's -16.54%.

On 3-year performance, JGRO leads with 20.47% vs 16.59% for JAVA. Both ETFs have the same 0.44% expense ratio. On volatility, JAVA has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JGRO has performed better with a 20.47% return vs 16.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JGRO and JAVA have the same expense ratio: 0.44% per year.

JAVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.15% for JGRO.

JGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while JAVA is Large Cap Value Equities.

JAVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGRO and JAVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer