JGRO vs. JAVA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA).

JGRO and JAVA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JGRO is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. JAVA is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Oct 4, 2021.

Performance

JGRO vs. JAVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JGRO vs. JAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	-8.00%	14.71%	32.77%	37.74%	-10.03%
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	0.62%	14.92%	15.52%	10.46%	2.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than JAVA's 0.62% return.

JGRO

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -3.84%
• YTD: -8.00%
• 6M: -8.96%
• 1Y: 15.16%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JAVA

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -4.76%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 4.80%
• 1Y: 15.01%
• 3Y*: 13.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGRO vs. JAVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JGRO and JAVA have an expense ratio of 0.44%.

JGRO

JPMorgan Active Growth ETF

JAVA

JPMorgan Active Value ETF

Return for Risk

JGRO vs. JAVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRO

JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 36
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

JAVA

JAVA Risk / Return Rank: 51
JAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
JAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
JAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
JAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
JAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRO vs. JAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JGRO	JAVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.96	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	1.41	-0.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.20	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	1.34	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	5.23	-2.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JGRO vs. JAVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the JAVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGRO and JAVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JGRO	JAVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	0.96	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.68	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between JGRO and JAVA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

JGRO vs. JAVA - Dividend Comparison

JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than JAVA's 1.35% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	0.17%	0.16%	0.10%	0.17%	0.16%	0.00%
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	1.35%	1.34%	1.45%	1.65%	1.25%	0.48%

Drawdowns

JGRO vs. JAVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, which is greater than JAVA's maximum drawdown of -16.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and JAVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGRO	JAVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-16.54%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.44%	-11.12%	-5.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.49%	-6.09%	-6.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-3.71%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.30%	2.85%	+2.45%

Volatility

JGRO vs. JAVA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) at 4.43%. This indicates that JGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGRO	JAVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.70%	4.43%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	8.85%	+3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.47%	15.64%	+5.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.12%	14.94%	+5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	14.94%	+5.18%