IJH vs. SCHM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM).
IJH and SCHM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. SCHM is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. Both IJH and SCHM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IJH or SCHM.
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and SCHM is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IJH vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IJH:
0.93
SCHM:
0.93
IJH:
1.38
SCHM:
1.34
IJH:
1.17
SCHM:
1.17
IJH:
1.84
SCHM:
1.72
IJH:
5.22
SCHM:
4.81
IJH:
2.87%
SCHM:
2.91%
IJH:
16.08%
SCHM:
15.14%
IJH:
-55.06%
SCHM:
-42.43%
IJH:
-8.11%
SCHM:
-7.80%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHM's 12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 9.63%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.
IJH
13.56%
-3.00%
7.09%
13.46%
10.25%
9.63%
SCHM
12.36%
-3.00%
7.96%
12.57%
10.07%
10.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJH vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IJH vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IJH vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than SCHM's 2.06% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.72% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.34% | 1.29% |
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 2.06% | 3.03% | 3.10% | 2.91% | 3.13% | 3.81% | 2.63% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 2.20% | 3.68% | 1.82% |
Drawdowns
IJH vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.06%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and SCHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IJH vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.