IJH vs. IJK
IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 11.74%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for IJK. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for IJK.
Performance
IJH vs. IJK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly lower than IJK's 20.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJH having a 11.74% annualized return and IJK not far ahead at 12.03%.
IJH
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
IJK
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
IJH vs. IJK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 15.82% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 20.35% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and IJK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IJH and IJK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJH vs. IJK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJH
IJK
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IJH
IJK
Technology
IJH
IJK
Financial Services
IJH
IJK
Consumer Cyclical
IJH
IJK
Healthcare
IJH
IJK
Real Estate
IJH
IJK
Energy
IJH
IJK
Basic Materials
IJH
IJK
Consumer Defensive
IJH
IJK
Utilities
IJH
IJK
Communication Services
IJH
IJK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJH vs. IJK — Risk / Return Rank
IJH
IJK
IJH vs. IJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJH | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.28 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | 12.90 | -1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJH vs. IJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, roughly equal to the maximum IJK drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and IJK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJH | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.07% | -54.47% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -9.92% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -25.63% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -29.24% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.18% | -39.25% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -10.78% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.52% | -0.11% |
Volatility
IJH vs. IJK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is 4.59%, while iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that IJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJH | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 5.57% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 13.76% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 17.56% | -1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 20.77% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 21.11% | +0.10% |
IJH vs. IJK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IJK's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJH vs. IJK - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than IJK's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.52% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IJH and IJK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJK has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to IJH (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs IJK's -54.47%.
On 10-year performance, IJK leads with 12.03% vs 11.74% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJK has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.52% for IJK.
IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IJK is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.17% for IJK.
IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJH and IJK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer