PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJH vs. IJK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJH vs. IJK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly lower than IJK's 20.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJH having a 11.74% annualized return and IJK not far ahead at 12.03%.


IJH

1D
0.38%
1M
3.76%
YTD
15.82%
6M
13.38%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
11.74%

IJK

1D
0.59%
1M
4.15%
YTD
20.35%
6M
17.46%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH vs. IJK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
15.82%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
20.35%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and IJK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.97

The correlation between IJH and IJK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJH vs. IJK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJH
IJK

Industrials

25.9%
30.2%

Technology

16.6%
24.8%

Financial Services

13.5%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
7.5%

Healthcare

8.7%
13.7%

Real Estate

7.5%
5.3%

Energy

5.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.9%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
1.8%

Utilities

3.0%
2.0%

Communication Services

1.0%
1.4%

Industrials

IJH
25.9%
IJK
30.2%

Technology

IJH
16.6%
IJK
24.8%

Financial Services

IJH
13.5%
IJK
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
9.2%
IJK
7.5%

Healthcare

IJH
8.7%
IJK
13.7%

Real Estate

IJH
7.5%
IJK
5.3%

Energy

IJH
5.3%
IJK
3.2%

Basic Materials

IJH
4.9%
IJK
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

IJH
4.2%
IJK
1.8%

Utilities

IJH
3.0%
IJK
2.0%

Communication Services

IJH
1.0%
IJK
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJH vs. IJK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH vs. IJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJHIJKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.28

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

12.90

-1.45

IJH vs. IJK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the IJK Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and IJK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJH vs. IJK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, roughly equal to the maximum IJK drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and IJK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJHIJKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-54.47%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-9.92%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-25.63%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-29.24%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-39.25%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-10.78%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.52%

-0.11%

Volatility

IJH vs. IJK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is 4.59%, while iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that IJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJHIJKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

5.57%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

13.76%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

17.56%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.76%

20.77%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

21.11%

+0.10%

IJH vs. IJK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IJK's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJH vs. IJK - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than IJK's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.17%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.52%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IJH and IJK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJK has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to IJH (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs IJK's -54.47%.

On 10-year performance, IJK leads with 12.03% vs 11.74% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJK has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.52% for IJK.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IJK is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.17% for IJK.

IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and IJK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer