IJH vs. IJJ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF (IJJ).
IJH and IJJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IJJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400/Citigroup Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. Both IJH and IJJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IJH or IJJ.
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and IJJ is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IJH vs. IJJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IJH:
0.93
IJJ:
0.71
IJH:
1.38
IJJ:
1.08
IJH:
1.17
IJJ:
1.14
IJH:
1.84
IJJ:
1.31
IJH:
5.22
IJJ:
3.76
IJH:
2.87%
IJJ:
3.06%
IJH:
16.08%
IJJ:
16.27%
IJH:
-55.06%
IJJ:
-58.00%
IJH:
-8.11%
IJJ:
-8.76%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than IJJ's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has outperformed IJJ with an annualized return of 9.63%, while IJJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.83% annualized return.
IJH
13.56%
-3.00%
7.09%
13.46%
10.25%
9.63%
IJJ
9.92%
-4.09%
10.33%
9.96%
9.69%
8.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJH vs. IJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IJJ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IJH vs. IJJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF (IJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IJH vs. IJJ - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than IJJ's 2.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.72% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.34% | 1.29% |
IJJ iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF | 2.28% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% | 1.65% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
IJH vs. IJJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.06%, smaller than the maximum IJJ drawdown of -58.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and IJJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IJH vs. IJJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.