ILCB vs. ROUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCB returned 15.00%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for ROUS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.

Performance

ILCB vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCB has outperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 15.00%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.01% annualized return.

ILCB

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 6M: 11.10%
• 1Y: 28.03%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 13.45%
• 10Y*: 15.00%

ROUS

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.18%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 16.75%
• 1Y: 29.42%
• 3Y*: 20.87%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCB vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	11.12%	17.70%	24.96%	26.91%	-19.48%	24.07%	19.40%	32.68%	-8.51%	22.09%
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	16.55%	15.21%	17.61%	15.05%	-9.65%	27.33%	6.61%	23.94%	-9.59%	22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCB and ROUS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.81

The correlation between ILCB and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCB vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILCB	ROUS
Technology	35.5%	33.2%
Financial Services	11.7%	10.6%
Communication Services	11.4%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.6%
Industrials	8.6%	10.4%
Healthcare	8.6%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	5.8%
Energy	3.5%	3.0%
Utilities	2.3%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.2%

Return for Risk

ILCB vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCB

ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 69
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCB vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ILCB	ROUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.60	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.67	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.46	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	4.95	-1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.24	20.38	-6.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ILCB vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCB Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCB and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILCB	ROUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.60	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.90	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.77	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.67	-0.04

Drawdowns

ILCB vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and ROUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILCB	ROUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.53%	-35.51%	-16.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-5.97%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.05%	-15.81%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-18.91%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.30%	-35.51%	+0.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-4.24%	-2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.45%	+0.52%

Volatility

ILCB vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that ILCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILCB	ROUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	2.54%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.10%	8.50%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.02%	11.37%	+0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.13%	14.38%	+2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.16%	16.96%	+1.20%

ILCB vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ILCB vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	0.97%	1.11%	1.19%	1.43%	1.65%	1.16%	1.26%	2.25%	2.17%	1.81%	1.97%	2.44%
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.32%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILCB and ROUS in my portfolio?

ILCB and ROUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILCB or ROUS?

ILCB has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

Which ETF is better, ILCB or ROUS?

On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 15.00% vs 13.01% for ROUS. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILCB or ROUS?

Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILCB or ROUS?

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILCB or ROUS?

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.

What is the main difference between ILCB and ROUS?

ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.19% for ROUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.