ILCB vs. QQQ
ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCB returned 15.00%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
ILCB vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCB has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 15.00%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
ILCB vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -8.51% | 22.09% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCB and QQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ILCB and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCB vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCB
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ILCB
QQQ
Financial Services
ILCB
QQQ
Communication Services
ILCB
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
ILCB
QQQ
Industrials
ILCB
QQQ
Healthcare
ILCB
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
ILCB
QQQ
Energy
ILCB
QQQ
Utilities
ILCB
QQQ
Real Estate
ILCB
QQQ
Basic Materials
ILCB
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCB vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ILCB
QQQ
ILCB vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILCB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 3.51 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.24 | 13.49 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILCB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.64 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.41 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
ILCB vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.53% | -82.97% | +31.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -11.96% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -22.77% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -35.12% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.30% | -35.12% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.26% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -32.79% | +26.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.11% | -1.14% |
Volatility
ILCB vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) is 2.88%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that ILCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 4.49% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 12.10% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 15.94% | -3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 22.38% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 22.29% | -4.13% |
ILCB vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCB vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ILCB and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 15.00% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 15.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
ILCB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCB and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer