ILCB vs. MEME
ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ILCB is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ILCB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
ILCB vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 1.42% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 79.03% | -36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCB and MEME is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.60 |
ILCB vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCB
MEME
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
ILCB
MEME
Financial Services
ILCB
MEME
Communication Services
ILCB
MEME
Consumer Cyclical
ILCB
MEME
-
Industrials
ILCB
MEME
Healthcare
ILCB
MEME
Consumer Defensive
ILCB
MEME
-
Energy
ILCB
MEME
Utilities
ILCB
MEME
Real Estate
ILCB
MEME
-
Basic Materials
ILCB
MEME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCB vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank
ILCB
MEME
ILCB vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILCB | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILCB | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.28 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
ILCB vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, which is greater than MEME's maximum drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCB | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.53% | -48.78% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -5.93% | +5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -29.90% | +23.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility
ILCB vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCB | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 74.19% | -62.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 74.19% | -57.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 74.19% | -56.03% |
ILCB vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILCB vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCB and MEME have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for ILCB and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer