PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. MDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. MDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than MDY's 13.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJT having a 10.74% annualized return and MDY not far ahead at 11.04%.


IJT

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.97%
YTD
15.36%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
10.74%

MDY

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.81%
YTD
13.91%
6M
14.15%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. MDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
15.36%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
13.91%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%13.50%25.78%-11.29%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and MDY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000

0.93

The correlation between IJT and MDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJT vs. MDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
MDY

Technology

20.1%
15.4%

Industrials

20.0%
25.1%

Healthcare

14.5%
8.7%

Financial Services

13.6%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.8%

Real Estate

6.3%
7.7%

Energy

4.9%
5.6%

Basic Materials

2.8%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.0%

Utilities

1.9%
3.1%

Technology

IJT
20.1%
MDY
15.4%

Industrials

IJT
20.0%
MDY
25.1%

Healthcare

IJT
14.5%
MDY
8.7%

Financial Services

IJT
13.6%
MDY
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
9.8%
MDY
10.8%

Real Estate

IJT
6.3%
MDY
7.7%

Energy

IJT
4.9%
MDY
5.6%

Basic Materials

IJT
2.8%
MDY
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
2.8%
MDY
3.8%

Communication Services

IJT
2.7%
MDY
1.0%

Utilities

IJT
1.9%
MDY
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. MDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJTMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.85

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

10.38

-0.32

IJT vs. MDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the MDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and MDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJTMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.63

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.40

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.52

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.53

-0.13

Drawdowns

IJT vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, roughly equal to the maximum MDY drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and MDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-55.33%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-8.82%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-24.03%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-24.03%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-42.22%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.09%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-7.03%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.42%

+0.19%

Volatility

IJT vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) at 4.33%. This indicates that IJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.33%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

11.28%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

15.48%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

19.77%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

21.19%

+1.83%

IJT vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than MDY's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.77%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.04%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IJT and MDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJT has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to MDY (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs MDY's -55.33%.

On 10-year performance, MDY leads with 11.04% vs 10.74% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MDY has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.

MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.77% for IJT.

IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.23% for MDY.

MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and MDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer