PortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. SLYG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and SLYG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

IJT vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
558.32%
313.56%
IJT
SLYG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IJT:

-0.30

SLYG:

-0.30

Sortino Ratio

IJT:

-0.28

SLYG:

-0.28

Omega Ratio

IJT:

0.97

SLYG:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

IJT:

-0.26

SLYG:

-0.25

Martin Ratio

IJT:

-0.89

SLYG:

-0.89

Ulcer Index

IJT:

7.86%

SLYG:

7.84%

Daily Std Dev

IJT:

23.54%

SLYG:

23.41%

Max Drawdown

IJT:

-57.61%

SLYG:

-63.19%

Current Drawdown

IJT:

-22.82%

SLYG:

-22.84%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IJT having a -14.32% return and SLYG slightly lower at -14.38%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJT having a 6.91% annualized return and SLYG not far ahead at 7.01%.


IJT

YTD

-14.32%

1M

-6.65%

6M

-16.28%

1Y

-6.21%

5Y*

10.52%

10Y*

6.91%

SLYG

YTD

-14.38%

1M

-6.69%

6M

-16.22%

1Y

-6.16%

5Y*

10.54%

10Y*

7.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IJT vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Expense ratio chart for IJT: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IJT: 0.25%
Expense ratio chart for SLYG: current value is 0.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SLYG: 0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IJT vs. SLYG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IJT is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IJT is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IJT is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IJT is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IJT is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IJT is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLYG is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLYG is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLYG is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLYG is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLYG is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLYG is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IJT vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for IJT, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
IJT: -0.30
SLYG: -0.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for IJT, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
IJT: -0.28
SLYG: -0.28
The chart of Omega ratio for IJT, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
IJT: 0.97
SLYG: 0.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for IJT, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
IJT: -0.26
SLYG: -0.25
The chart of Martin ratio for IJT, currently valued at -0.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
IJT: -0.89
SLYG: -0.89

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and SLYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.30
-0.30
IJT
SLYG

Dividends

IJT vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than SLYG's 1.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
1.27%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%0.78%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
1.46%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%4.42%

Drawdowns

IJT vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and SLYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-22.82%
-22.84%
IJT
SLYG

Volatility

IJT vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) have volatilities of 14.31% and 14.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.31%
14.32%
IJT
SLYG