PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 10.80%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.


IJT

1D
0.68%
1M
0.94%
YTD
16.04%
6M
15.93%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
10.80%

ISCG

1D
0.57%
1M
4.00%
YTD
13.99%
6M
14.96%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
16.04%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
13.99%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and ISCG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2004

0.91

The correlation between IJT and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJT vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
ISCG

Technology

20.1%
21.4%

Industrials

20.0%
24.6%

Healthcare

14.5%
15.4%

Financial Services

13.6%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.9%

Real Estate

6.3%
5.2%

Energy

4.9%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.8%

Utilities

1.9%
1.0%

Technology

IJT
20.1%
ISCG
21.4%

Industrials

IJT
20.0%
ISCG
24.6%

Healthcare

IJT
14.5%
ISCG
15.4%

Financial Services

IJT
13.6%
ISCG
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
9.8%
ISCG
9.9%

Real Estate

IJT
6.3%
ISCG
5.2%

Energy

IJT
4.9%
ISCG
2.8%

Basic Materials

IJT
2.8%
ISCG
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
2.8%
ISCG
2.9%

Communication Services

IJT
2.7%
ISCG
2.8%

Utilities

IJT
1.9%
ISCG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJTISCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

1.88

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.62

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.98

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.95

11.42

-0.48

IJT vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJTISCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.88

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.25

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.50

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.41

-0.02

Drawdowns

IJT vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, roughly equal to the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-57.72%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-11.43%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-26.71%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-37.80%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-41.48%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

0.00%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-11.63%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.98%

-0.37%

Volatility

IJT vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.81%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

13.11%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

18.10%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

22.95%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.03%

23.16%

-0.13%

IJT vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than ISCG's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.76%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.56%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IJT and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ISCG has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to IJT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 10-year performance, ISCG leads with 11.47% vs 10.80% for IJT. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCG has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.56% for ISCG.

IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.06% for ISCG.

ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer