PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 22.75% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.74%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.01% annualized return.


IJT

1D
1.25%
1M
6.84%
YTD
22.75%
6M
19.00%
1Y
31.95%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
11.74%

QQQ

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
15.95%
6M
14.16%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
22.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
22.75%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
15.95%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and QQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.75

The correlation between IJT and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
QQQ

Technology

21.2%
58.7%

Industrials

18.7%
2.6%

Healthcare

14.7%
3.7%

Financial Services

13.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
11.4%

Real Estate

6.5%
0.1%

Energy

3.8%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
6.4%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
14.3%

Utilities

1.7%
1.2%

Technology

IJT
21.2%
QQQ
58.7%

Industrials

IJT
18.7%
QQQ
2.6%

Healthcare

IJT
14.7%
QQQ
3.7%

Financial Services

IJT
13.5%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
10.7%
QQQ
11.4%

Real Estate

IJT
6.5%
QQQ
0.1%

Energy

IJT
3.8%
QQQ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
3.3%
QQQ
6.4%

Basic Materials

IJT
3.0%
QQQ
1.0%

Communication Services

IJT
2.9%
QQQ
14.3%

Utilities

IJT
1.7%
QQQ
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.71

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

10.01

+2.34

IJT vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-82.97%

+25.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-11.96%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-22.77%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-35.12%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-35.12%

-6.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.66%

+4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-32.72%

+22.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.23%

-0.64%

Volatility

IJT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 5.38%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

9.17%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

14.54%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

17.95%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.55%

22.69%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

22.41%

+0.61%

IJT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IJT and QQQ have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.70%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to IJT (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.01% vs 11.74% for IJT. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.01% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJT and QQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.

IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer