IJT vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJT is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJT returned 10.74%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for IWM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

IJT vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJT having a 10.74% annualized return and IWM not far ahead at 10.93%.

IJT

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 15.36%
• 6M: 13.60%
• 1Y: 26.21%
• 3Y*: 14.39%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF	15.36%	5.26%	9.33%	17.11%	-21.32%	22.37%	19.22%	20.98%	-4.40%	14.47%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and IWM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000	0.95

The correlation between IJT and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJT vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJT	IWM
Technology	20.1%	19.5%
Industrials	20.0%	17.1%
Healthcare	14.5%	15.8%
Financial Services	13.6%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	7.8%
Real Estate	6.3%	5.7%
Energy	4.9%	6.0%
Basic Materials	2.8%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	2.1%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.0%
Utilities	1.9%	3.0%

Return for Risk

IJT vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT

IJT Risk / Return Rank: 48
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IJT	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.05	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.85	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	3.56	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	12.64	-2.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IJT vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IJT	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.05	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.27	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.48	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.37	+0.03

Drawdowns

IJT vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJT	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.61%	-59.05%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.08%	-11.03%	+1.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	-27.50%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	-31.91%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.03%	-41.13%	-0.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-1.49%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.31%	-10.77%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	3.10%	-0.49%

Volatility

IJT vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 4.61%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJT	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	5.75%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.47%	13.53%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.56%	19.20%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.50%	22.52%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.02%	23.04%	-0.02%

IJT vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJT vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than IWM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF	0.77%	0.91%	1.06%	1.02%	1.08%	0.63%	0.68%	0.92%	0.92%	0.86%	1.03%	1.14%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJT and IWM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, IJT and IWM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IJT or IWM?

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to IJT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, IJT or IWM?

On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.93% vs 10.74% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJT or IWM?

Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJT or IWM?

IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJT or IWM?

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.77% for IJT.

What is the main difference between IJT and IWM?

IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.