IGV vs. SCHG
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.70%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
IGV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.70%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
IGV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and SCHG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and SCHG has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
SCHG
Communication Services
IGV
SCHG
Financial Services
IGV
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
SCHG
Industrials
IGV
SCHG
Basic Materials
IGV
-
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
SCHG
Energy
IGV
-
SCHG
Healthcare
IGV
-
SCHG
Real Estate
IGV
-
SCHG
Utilities
IGV
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
SCHG
IGV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.20 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.10 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 3.58 | -4.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -34.59% | -28.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -16.41% | -20.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -23.39% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -34.59% | -11.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -34.59% | -11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.85% | -6.46% | -19.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -5.20% | -9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 5.02% | +12.92% |
Volatility
IGV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.71% | 5.91% | +6.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 12.52% | +12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.27% | 16.24% | +12.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 22.38% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 21.58% | +4.80% |
IGV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and SCHG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 15.70% for IGV. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.04% for SCHG.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer