IGV vs. SMH
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.70%/yr vs 37.85%/yr for SMH. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
IGV vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.70%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.85% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
IGV vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and SMH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and SMH has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
SMH
Communication Services
IGV
SMH
-
Financial Services
IGV
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
SMH
-
Industrials
IGV
SMH
-
Basic Materials
IGV
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
SMH
-
Energy
IGV
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
IGV
-
SMH
-
Utilities
IGV
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
SMH
IGV vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.58 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 9.31 | -9.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 33.88 | -34.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -84.96% | +21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -14.93% | -21.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -35.74% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -45.30% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -45.30% | -0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.85% | -7.01% | -18.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -41.01% | +26.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 4.10% | +13.84% |
Volatility
IGV vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is 12.71%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.71% | 19.08% | -6.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 29.18% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.27% | 34.87% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 35.83% | -7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 32.97% | -6.59% |
IGV vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and SMH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to IGV (12.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.85% vs 15.70% for IGV. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 12.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer