IGF vs. VYM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.26%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for VYM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.

Performance

IGF vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 8.26%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.

IGF

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

VYM

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 10.58%
• 1Y: 24.30%
• 3Y*: 17.89%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	7.07%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF	10.82%	15.42%	17.60%	6.57%	-0.43%	26.20%	1.15%	24.06%	-5.92%	16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and VYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007	0.75

The correlation between IGF and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGF vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGF	VYM
Utilities	41.1%	5.7%
Industrials	38.8%	12.1%
Energy	20.1%	9.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	3.5%
Communication Services	-	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.1%
Financial Services	-	20.5%
Healthcare	-	12.2%
Technology	-	17.7%

Return for Risk

IGF vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 45
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

VYM

VYM Risk / Return Rank: 80
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGF	VYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.36	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	3.36	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	3.65	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	13.64	-6.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGF vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGF	VYM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	2.36	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.81	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.72	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.50	-0.27

Drawdowns

IGF vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and VYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGF	VYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.33%	-56.98%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.87%	-6.69%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-14.46%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	-15.84%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.11%	-35.21%	-6.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.29%	-1.89%	-3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-7.19%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.79%	+0.18%

Volatility

IGF vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.82%. This indicates that IGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGF	VYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	2.82%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	7.73%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.56%	10.35%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	13.98%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	16.35%	+0.49%

IGF vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGF vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than VYM's 2.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	3.01%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF	2.22%	2.44%	2.74%	3.12%	3.01%	2.76%	3.18%	3.03%	3.40%	2.80%	2.91%	3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGF and VYM in my portfolio?

IGF and VYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGF or VYM?

IGF has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to VYM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs VYM's -56.98%.

Which ETF is better, IGF or VYM?

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.70% vs 8.26% for IGF. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGF or VYM?

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGF or VYM?

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGF or VYM?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

What is the main difference between IGF and VYM?

IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VYM is Dividend. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.04% for VYM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.