PortfoliosLab logo
IGF vs. NFRA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and NFRA is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

IGF vs. NFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IGF:

1.61

NFRA:

1.40

Sortino Ratio

IGF:

2.14

NFRA:

1.93

Omega Ratio

IGF:

1.31

NFRA:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

IGF:

2.60

NFRA:

1.93

Martin Ratio

IGF:

9.93

NFRA:

5.37

Ulcer Index

IGF:

2.29%

NFRA:

3.29%

Daily Std Dev

IGF:

14.30%

NFRA:

12.95%

Max Drawdown

IGF:

-58.33%

NFRA:

-32.49%

Current Drawdown

IGF:

-0.19%

NFRA:

-0.15%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IGF having a 12.88% return and NFRA slightly higher at 13.21%. Over the past 10 years, IGF has outperformed NFRA with an annualized return of 6.33%, while NFRA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.


IGF

YTD

12.88%

1M

4.52%

6M

7.64%

1Y

20.93%

3Y*

8.14%

5Y*

11.70%

10Y*

6.33%

NFRA

YTD

13.21%

1M

3.94%

6M

5.53%

1Y

15.83%

3Y*

6.07%

5Y*

7.70%

10Y*

5.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IGF vs. NFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than NFRA's 0.47% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IGF vs. NFRA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IGF is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IGF is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IGF is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IGF is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NFRA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NFRA is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NFRA is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NFRA is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NFRA is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NFRA is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NFRA is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IGF vs. NFRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the NFRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and NFRA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IGF vs. NFRA - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than NFRA's 2.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.85%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.99%3.24%3.00%
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
2.97%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%3.01%

Drawdowns

IGF vs. NFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than NFRA's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and NFRA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IGF vs. NFRA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...