IGF vs. SPY
IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGF returned 8.35%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for SPY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
IGF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 8.35%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.
IGF
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
IGF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.67% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and SPY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGF and SPY has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGF
SPY
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
IGF
SPY
Industrials
IGF
SPY
Energy
IGF
SPY
Real Estate
IGF
SPY
Basic Materials
IGF
-
SPY
Communication Services
IGF
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
IGF
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
IGF
-
SPY
Financial Services
IGF
-
SPY
Healthcare
IGF
-
SPY
Technology
IGF
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
IGF
SPY
IGF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 2.52 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 3.42 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.42 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 15.93 | -7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.52 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.59 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -55.19% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -8.88% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -18.76% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -24.50% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.11% | -33.72% | -8.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | 0.00% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.87% | -9.05% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.91% | -0.03% |
Volatility
IGF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that IGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 2.75% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 8.89% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 11.81% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 17.05% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 17.94% | -1.10% |
IGF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.97% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGF and SPY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGF has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.57% vs 8.35% for IGF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.
IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer