PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGF vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 8.35%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


IGF

1D
1.45%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
8.67%
6M
8.66%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
8.35%

SPY

1D
0.14%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
8.67%21.31%14.81%6.14%-1.26%11.57%-6.50%25.82%-9.95%19.31%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and SPY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between IGF and SPY has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IGF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGF
SPY

Utilities

41.1%
2.4%

Industrials

38.8%
7.8%

Energy

20.1%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Technology

-

35.9%

Utilities

IGF
41.1%
SPY
2.4%

Industrials

IGF
38.8%
SPY
7.8%

Energy

IGF
20.1%
SPY
3.6%

Real Estate

IGF
0.1%
SPY
1.9%

Basic Materials

IGF

-

SPY
1.8%

Communication Services

IGF

-

SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IGF

-

SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

IGF

-

SPY
4.8%

Financial Services

IGF

-

SPY
11.8%

Healthcare

IGF

-

SPY
8.4%

Technology

IGF

-

SPY
35.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGFSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

2.52

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

3.42

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.42

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.91

15.93

-7.02

IGF vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGFSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.52

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.84

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.87

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.59

-0.35

Drawdowns

IGF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGFSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.33%

-55.19%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-8.88%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

-18.76%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

-24.50%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.11%

-33.72%

-8.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

0.00%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.87%

-9.05%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.91%

-0.03%

Volatility

IGF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that IGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGFSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.75%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

8.89%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.81%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

17.05%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

17.94%

-1.10%

IGF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.97%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGF and SPY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGF has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.57% vs 8.35% for IGF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.

IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGF and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer