IGF vs. GII
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII).
IGF and GII are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. GII is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure. It was launched on Jan 25, 2007. Both IGF and GII are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGF or GII.
Correlation
The correlation between IGF and GII is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IGF vs. GII - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IGF:
2.16
GII:
2.12
IGF:
2.94
GII:
2.86
IGF:
1.38
GII:
1.36
IGF:
2.52
GII:
3.17
IGF:
12.08
GII:
12.13
IGF:
2.10%
GII:
2.08%
IGF:
11.72%
GII:
11.90%
IGF:
-58.33%
GII:
-50.98%
IGF:
0.00%
GII:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than GII's 5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed GII with an annualized return of 5.69%, while GII has yielded a comparatively higher 6.19% annualized return.
IGF
4.92%
5.71%
12.15%
25.42%
5.17%
5.69%
GII
5.21%
5.76%
12.16%
25.58%
6.01%
6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGF vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGF vs. GII — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IGF
GII
IGF vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGF vs. GII - Dividend Comparison
IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, which matches GII's 3.07% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.06% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.24% | 3.00% |
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.07% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 3.88% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% | 3.12% |
Drawdowns
IGF vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than GII's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and GII. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGF vs. GII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 4.11%, while SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.