IGF vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGF returned 9.75%/yr vs 16.65%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

IGF vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 86.43% return.

IGF

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

FLKR

• 1D: 6.28%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 86.43%
• 6M: 95.63%
• 1Y: 177.77%
• 3Y*: 43.23%
• 5Y*: 16.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	7.07%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	0.18%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	86.43%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and FLKR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.50

The correlation between IGF and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGF vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGF	FLKR
Utilities	41.1%	0.3%
Industrials	38.8%	12.8%
Energy	20.1%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.5%
Financial Services	-	7.6%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Technology	-	64.3%

Return for Risk

IGF vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 45
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 94
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGF	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	4.03	-2.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	3.85	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.57	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	7.77	-5.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	27.92	-20.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGF vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGF	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	4.03	-2.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.57	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.47	-0.24

Drawdowns

IGF vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGF	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.33%	-50.06%	-8.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.87%	-23.03%	+17.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-26.39%	+12.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	-49.51%	+28.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.29%	-14.59%	+9.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-22.06%	+10.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	6.40%	-4.43%

Volatility

IGF vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 3.61%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 26.26%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGF	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	26.26%	-22.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	40.64%	-31.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.56%	44.43%	-33.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	29.12%	-15.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	28.11%	-11.27%

IGF vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGF vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than FLKR's 2.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.07%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	3.01%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGF and FLKR in my portfolio?

IGF and FLKR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGF or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to IGF (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGF dropped -58.33% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, IGF or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 16.65% vs 9.75% for IGF. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGF or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 16.65% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGF or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGF or FLKR?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.07% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between IGF and FLKR?

IGF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGF and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.