PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. FLJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKR vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 61.37% return, which is significantly higher than FLJP's 14.80% return.


FLKR

1D
-2.28%
1M
-12.85%
6M
29.07%
YTD
61.37%
1Y
124.39%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.21%

FLJP

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.06%
6M
8.11%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$34.44M$45.56M$43.61M
$43.49M$47.84M$51.57M

FLKR vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
61.37%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
14.80%26.79%6.99%20.00%-16.57%0.99%15.76%18.99%-14.01%2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and FLJP is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.58

The correlation between FLKR and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLKR vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLKR
FLJP

Technology

50.8%
20.6%

Industrials

17.1%
25.6%

Financial Services

12.3%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
11.1%

Healthcare

3.6%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.9%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.0%

Energy

0.7%
0.9%

Utilities

0.5%
1.2%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

FLKR
50.8%
FLJP
20.6%

Industrials

FLKR
17.1%
FLJP
25.6%

Financial Services

FLKR
12.3%
FLJP
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
7.1%
FLJP
11.1%

Healthcare

FLKR
3.6%
FLJP
5.8%

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.9%
FLJP
4.8%

Communication Services

FLKR
2.5%
FLJP
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
2.2%
FLJP
4.0%

Energy

FLKR
0.7%
FLJP
0.9%

Utilities

FLKR
0.5%
FLJP
1.2%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

FLJP
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLKR vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLKRFLJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.27

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

7.59

+4.68

FLKR vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and FLJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than FLJP's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and FLJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKRFLJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-32.49%

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.17%

-13.30%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.17%

-14.17%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.97%

-32.49%

-15.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.42%

-4.24%

-24.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-9.25%

-12.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.61%

3.98%

+5.63%

Volatility

FLKR vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 21.39% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 7.24%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKRFLJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.39%

7.24%

+14.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.33%

16.93%

+33.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.42%

20.04%

+33.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

18.12%

+14.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.79%

17.94%

+11.85%

FLKR vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLKR and FLJP have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLKR vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than FLJP's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.29%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.86%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLKR and FLJP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to FLJP (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs FLJP's -32.49%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 14.07% vs 9.38% for FLJP. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 7.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 14.07% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR and FLJP have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 2.86% for FLKR.

FLKR is categorized as South Korea Equities, while FLJP is Japan Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and FLJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer