PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. EWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKR vs. EWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLKR having a 61.37% return and EWY slightly higher at 61.59%.


FLKR

1D
-2.28%
1M
-12.85%
6M
29.07%
YTD
61.37%
1Y
124.39%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.21%

EWY

1D
-2.55%
1M
-12.79%
6M
28.34%
YTD
61.59%
1Y
127.36%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
13.13%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.45B$4.55B$4.16B
$43.49M$47.84M$51.57M

FLKR vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
61.37%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
61.59%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and EWY is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FLKR and EWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLKR vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLKR
EWY

Technology

50.8%
54.1%

Industrials

17.1%
15.7%

Financial Services

12.3%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
5.9%

Healthcare

3.6%
3.6%

Basic Materials

2.9%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
2.2%

Energy

0.7%
1.0%

Utilities

0.5%
0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

FLKR
50.8%
EWY
54.1%

Industrials

FLKR
17.1%
EWY
15.7%

Financial Services

FLKR
12.3%
EWY
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
7.1%
EWY
5.9%

Healthcare

FLKR
3.6%
EWY
3.6%

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.9%
EWY
2.2%

Communication Services

FLKR
2.5%
EWY
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
2.2%
EWY
2.2%

Energy

FLKR
0.7%
EWY
1.0%

Utilities

FLKR
0.5%
EWY
0.4%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

EWY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLKR vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLKREWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.55

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

12.67

-0.39

FLKR vs. EWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the EWY Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and EWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and EWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKREWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-74.14%

+24.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.17%

-34.21%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.17%

-34.21%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.97%

-47.15%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.42%

-28.33%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-20.10%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.61%

9.56%

+0.05%

Volatility

FLKR vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) have volatilities of 21.39% and 22.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKREWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.39%

22.08%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.33%

50.88%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.42%

54.29%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

32.77%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.79%

29.38%

+0.41%

FLKR vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLKR vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than EWY's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.30%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.86%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FLKR and EWY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EWY has higher volatility (22.08%) compared to FLKR (21.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs EWY's -74.14%.

On 5-year performance, EWY leads with 14.47% vs 14.07% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLKR has been the lower-risk option at 21.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWY has performed better with a 14.47% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.30% for EWY.

FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.59% for EWY.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and EWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer