FLKR vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 19.48%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.

Performance

FLKR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 114.41% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return.

FLKR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 29.00%
• YTD: 114.41%
• 6M: 130.14%
• 1Y: 238.40%
• 3Y*: 51.14%
• 5Y*: 19.48%
• 10Y*: —

SCHD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 19.01%
• 6M: 18.63%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	114.41%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	2.84%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	19.01%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and SCHD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between FLKR and SCHD has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLKR vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLKR	SCHD
Technology	64.3%	16.4%
Industrials	12.8%	7.5%
Financial Services	7.6%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	6.3%
Basic Materials	2.6%	1.2%
Healthcare	2.5%	18.8%
Communication Services	1.6%	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	19.2%
Energy	0.4%	16.2%
Utilities	0.3%	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 80
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLKR	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.83	2.49	+3.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.23	3.87	+1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.45	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.42	5.91	+4.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.67	14.53	+24.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLKR vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 5.83, which is higher than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLKR	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.83	2.49	+3.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.58	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.86	-0.31

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-33.37%	-16.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.03%	-4.61%	-18.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-16.13%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.51%	-16.85%	-32.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-1.40%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-3.32%	-18.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.20%	1.88%	+4.32%

Volatility

FLKR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 20.21% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.21%	2.66%	+17.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.52%	7.66%	+28.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.18%	10.96%	+30.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.19%	14.38%	+13.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.56%	16.72%	+10.84%

FLKR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLKR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.80%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.26%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and SCHD in my portfolio?

FLKR and SCHD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKR or SCHD?

FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which ETF is better, FLKR or SCHD?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLKR or SCHD?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLKR or SCHD?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLKR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLKR or SCHD?

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between FLKR and SCHD?

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.06% for SCHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.