PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKR vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 114.41% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return.


FLKR

1D
-0.79%
1M
29.00%
YTD
114.41%
6M
130.14%
1Y
238.40%
3Y*
51.14%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*

KORU

1D
-2.29%
1M
92.47%
YTD
559.14%
6M
689.29%
1Y
2,160.10%
3Y*
132.56%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
114.41%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%2.84%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
559.14%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and KORU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FLKR and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLKR vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLKR
KORU

Technology

64.3%
52.3%

Industrials

12.8%
20.4%

Financial Services

7.6%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.6%
2.0%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

1.6%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
1.8%

Energy

0.4%
1.4%

Utilities

0.3%
0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

FLKR
64.3%
KORU
52.3%

Industrials

FLKR
12.8%
KORU
20.4%

Financial Services

FLKR
7.6%
KORU
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
6.0%
KORU
5.8%

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.6%
KORU
2.0%

Healthcare

FLKR
2.5%
KORU
3.5%

Communication Services

FLKR
1.6%
KORU
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
1.5%
KORU
1.8%

Energy

FLKR
0.4%
KORU
1.4%

Utilities

FLKR
0.3%
KORU
0.4%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

KORU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLKRKORUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.83

17.63

-11.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.23

5.20

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.72

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.42

35.65

-25.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

38.67

112.99

-74.32

FLKR vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 5.83, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 17.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLKRKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83

17.63

-11.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.28

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.13

+0.43

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKRKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-95.79%

+45.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.03%

-61.39%

+38.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-73.71%

+47.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.51%

-93.35%

+43.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-5.39%

+3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-57.53%

+35.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.20%

19.33%

-13.13%

Volatility

FLKR vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) is 20.21%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that FLKR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKRKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.21%

60.18%

-39.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.52%

110.71%

-74.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.18%

124.15%

-82.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.19%

85.11%

-56.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.56%

79.91%

-52.35%

FLKR vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLKR vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than KORU's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
1.80%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.14%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FLKR and KORU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to FLKR (20.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 5-year performance, KORU leads with 23.42% vs 19.48% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLKR has been the lower-risk option at 20.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KORU has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 19.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.14% for KORU.

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while KORU is Leveraged Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 5.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer