IFV vs. ROBT
IFV (First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFV returned 3.91%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for ROBT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFV charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
IFV vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFV achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 3.41% return.
IFV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
ROBT
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
IFV vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 7.64% | 32.26% | 0.33% | 20.45% | -25.39% | 5.59% | 6.15% | 26.29% | -22.05% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 3.41% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 34.28% | -14.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFV and ROBT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IFV and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFV vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFV
ROBT
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
IFV
ROBT
Financial Services
IFV
ROBT
Consumer Cyclical
IFV
ROBT
Basic Materials
IFV
ROBT
-
Technology
IFV
ROBT
Energy
IFV
ROBT
Real Estate
IFV
ROBT
-
Utilities
IFV
ROBT
-
Healthcare
IFV
ROBT
Consumer Defensive
IFV
ROBT
Communication Services
IFV
ROBT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFV vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
IFV
ROBT
IFV vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFV | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.11 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 0.66 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | 1.83 | +4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFV vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFV drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than ROBT's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFV and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFV | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -44.47% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -21.66% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.66% | -27.68% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.78% | -43.26% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -11.03% | +5.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -15.91% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 7.78% | -4.35% |
Volatility
IFV vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF (IFV) is 7.43%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 10.64%. This indicates that IFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFV | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 10.64% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 19.27% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 24.76% | -7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 25.48% | -7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 25.59% | -4.98% |
IFV vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFV has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFV vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
IFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFV First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF | 1.85% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.88% | 3.79% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 2.91% | 1.86% | 1.43% | 1.10% | 1.52% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFV and ROBT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to IFV (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFV dropped -48.89% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, IFV leads with 3.91% vs -0.15% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IFV has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFV has performed better with a 3.91% return vs -0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for IFV.
IFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
IFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. IFV tracks Dorsey Wright International Focus Five Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for IFV and 0.65% for ROBT.
IFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFV and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer