PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBT vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.


ROBT

1D
-2.40%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
3.51%
6M
1.75%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-4.41%
1M
-9.06%
YTD
1.13%
6M
0.29%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
3.51%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-14.66%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
1.13%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-31.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and BOTZ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2018

0.89

The correlation between ROBT and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBT
BOTZ

Technology

58.6%
31.8%

Industrials

20.1%
49.3%

Healthcare

6.9%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
6.4%

Communication Services

3.8%
4.4%

Financial Services

1.5%
0.9%

Energy

1.3%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

ROBT
58.6%
BOTZ
31.8%

Industrials

ROBT
20.1%
BOTZ
49.3%

Healthcare

ROBT
6.9%
BOTZ
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ROBT
6.4%
BOTZ
6.4%

Communication Services

ROBT
3.8%
BOTZ
4.4%

Financial Services

ROBT
1.5%
BOTZ
0.9%

Energy

ROBT
1.3%
BOTZ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

ROBT
1.3%
BOTZ
0.0%

Basic Materials

ROBT

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Real Estate

ROBT

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

ROBT

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBTBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.04

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

3.34

-1.12

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBTBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-55.54%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-19.34%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-29.02%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-55.54%

+12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.93%

-11.99%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-18.27%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.75%

6.01%

+1.74%

Volatility

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 10.81% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBTBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.81%

10.19%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.33%

20.13%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.76%

25.54%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.49%

27.03%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

25.83%

-0.24%

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (10.81%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 1.10% vs -0.08% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 1.10% return vs -0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

ROBT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBT and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer