ROBT vs. BOTZ
ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBT returned -0.08%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BOTZ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.
ROBT
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 3.51% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 34.28% | -14.66% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 1.13% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -31.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBT and BOTZ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ROBT and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBT
BOTZ
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ROBT
BOTZ
Industrials
ROBT
BOTZ
Healthcare
ROBT
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
ROBT
BOTZ
Communication Services
ROBT
BOTZ
Financial Services
ROBT
BOTZ
Energy
ROBT
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
ROBT
BOTZ
Basic Materials
ROBT
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
ROBT
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
ROBT
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
ROBT
BOTZ
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.04 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | 3.34 | -1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.47% | -55.54% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.66% | -19.34% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -29.02% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.26% | -55.54% | +12.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.93% | -11.99% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.91% | -18.27% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 6.01% | +1.74% |
Volatility
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 10.81% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.81% | 10.19% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.33% | 20.13% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.76% | 25.54% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 27.03% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 25.83% | -0.24% |
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (10.81%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 1.10% vs -0.08% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 1.10% return vs -0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
ROBT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBT and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer