PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBT vs. IBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROBT vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ROBT vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
-11.00%15.16%-0.41%10.83%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.97%28.57%6.39%18.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a -11.00% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's 0.97% return.


ROBT

1D
4.15%
1M
-9.19%
YTD
-11.00%
6M
-12.72%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
-2.47%
10Y*

IBOT

1D
4.22%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
0.97%
6M
6.86%
1Y
35.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROBT vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ROBT vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IBOT
IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBT vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBTIBOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

1.40

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

2.02

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.28

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.03

-1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.78

8.12

-6.35

ROBT vs. IBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and IBOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBTIBOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.40

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.84

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and IBOT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ROBT vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.38%0.38%2.81%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and IBOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBTIBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-25.39%

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-16.74%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.09%

-13.23%

-7.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-5.18%

-10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.73%

4.19%

+2.54%

Volatility

ROBT vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) is 8.78%, while VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) has a volatility of 9.33%. This indicates that ROBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ROBTIBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

9.33%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.22%

16.61%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.73%

25.61%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.00%

21.78%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.50%

21.78%

+3.72%