IFLR vs. GXTG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IFLR is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.

Performance

IFLR vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than GXTG's 10.18% return.

IFLR

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 5.52%
• 6M: 5.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXTG

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: 5.63%
• 3Y*: 2.16%
• 5Y*: -11.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	5.52%	3.03%
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	10.18%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and GXTG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.65

IFLR vs. GXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFLR	GXTG
Financial Services	21.6%	2.3%
Industrials	17.2%	8.0%
Technology	12.5%	22.3%
Healthcare	9.2%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	-
Basic Materials	5.6%	14.4%
Communication Services	3.7%	11.7%
Utilities	3.5%	12.4%
Energy	3.4%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	6.9%

Return for Risk

IFLR vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXTG

GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 11
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IFLR	GXTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.06	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.53	—

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and GXTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLR	GXTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	-67.81%	+58.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-56.45%	+54.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-43.17%	+40.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLR	GXTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	28.40%	-14.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	28.19%	-14.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	29.87%	-16.35%

IFLR vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLR vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than GXTG's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.27%	1.40%	1.08%	1.99%	1.48%	1.56%	0.48%	0.31%
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFLR and GXTG in my portfolio?

IFLR and GXTG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IFLR or GXTG?

On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLR or GXTG?

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLR or GXTG?

GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.

What is the main difference between IFLR and GXTG?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.50% for GXTG.