PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IFLR vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IFLR vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. IFLR is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

IFLR vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.94% return.

IFLR

1D
-1.55%
1M
1.07%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.81%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FFTY

1D
-4.21%
1M
5.39%
YTD
20.94%
6M
18.21%
1Y
36.43%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
IFLR
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF		5.00%3.03%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF		20.94%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and FFTY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.65

IFLR vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IFLR
FFTY

Financial Services

21.6%
6.7%

Industrials

17.2%
23.1%

Technology

12.5%
39.4%

Healthcare

9.2%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
2.8%

Basic Materials

5.6%
2.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.8%

Utilities

3.5%
2.1%

Energy

3.4%
7.3%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Financial Services

IFLR
21.6%
FFTY
6.7%

Industrials

IFLR
17.2%
FFTY
23.1%

Technology

IFLR
12.5%
FFTY
39.4%

Healthcare

IFLR
9.2%
FFTY
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IFLR
7.3%
FFTY
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

IFLR
6.4%
FFTY
2.8%

Basic Materials

IFLR
5.6%
FFTY
2.9%

Communication Services

IFLR
3.7%
FFTY
2.8%

Utilities

IFLR
3.5%
FFTY
2.1%

Energy

IFLR
3.4%
FFTY
7.3%

Real Estate

IFLR
1.6%
FFTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF

Innovator IBD 50 ETF

Often compared with IFLR:
IFLR vs. DIVDIFLR vs. FIXTIFLR vs. VEGAIFLR vs. UAUGIFLR vs. INKMIFLR vs. LVHIIFLR vs. UFO
Often compared with FFTY:
FFTY vs. SPYFFTY vs. QQQFFTY vs. BOUTFFTY vs. BFORFFTY vs. VOOFFTY vs. LOUPFFTY vs. IGV

Return for Risk

IFLR vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IFLR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IFLRFFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.02

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.44

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.19

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

1.57

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

4.14

—

IFLR vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and FFTY.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IFLRFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-59.46%

+49.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-23.29%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-29.60%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-59.46%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-59.46%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-14.76%

+12.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-22.34%

+19.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

8.82%

—

Volatility

IFLR vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IFLRFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

13.44%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

28.50%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

35.99%

-22.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

29.63%

-16.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

27.67%

-14.11%

IFLR vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLR vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than FFTY's 1.11% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF		1.11%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
IFLR
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF		0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IFLR and FFTY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.

IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.80% for FFTY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLR and FFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer