PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFLR vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFLR vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.90% return.


IFLR

1D
0.53%
1M
3.16%
YTD
5.50%
6M
8.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.74%
1M
0.47%
YTD
11.90%
6M
14.14%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
15.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLR vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFLR and LVHI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.65

IFLR vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFLR
LVHI

Financial Services

21.1%
23.6%

Industrials

17.4%
13.4%

Technology

11.4%
0.1%

Healthcare

9.6%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
8.7%

Basic Materials

5.7%
6.1%

Communication Services

3.9%
5.8%

Energy

3.7%
17.4%

Utilities

3.6%
10.4%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.9%

Financial Services

IFLR
21.1%
LVHI
23.6%

Industrials

IFLR
17.4%
LVHI
13.4%

Technology

IFLR
11.4%
LVHI
0.1%

Healthcare

IFLR
9.6%
LVHI
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IFLR
7.3%
LVHI
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

IFLR
6.6%
LVHI
8.7%

Basic Materials

IFLR
5.7%
LVHI
6.1%

Communication Services

IFLR
3.9%
LVHI
5.8%

Energy

IFLR
3.7%
LVHI
17.4%

Utilities

IFLR
3.6%
LVHI
10.4%

Real Estate

IFLR
1.7%
LVHI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFLR vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLR

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLR vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLR vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFLRLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.82

+0.71

Drawdowns

IFLR vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFLRLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-32.31%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-1.39%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-3.52%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

Volatility

IFLR vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFLRLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

9.45%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

11.06%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.09%

13.76%

-0.67%

IFLR vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFLR vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than LVHI's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IFLR
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
4.49%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFLR and LVHI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.28% for IFLR.

IFLR is categorized as Global Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.40% for LVHI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLR and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer