GXTG vs. AIQ
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while AIQ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -13.00%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for AIQ. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
GXTG vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 19.09% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- -6.02%
- 3Y*
- -3.08%
- 5Y*
- -13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.26%
AIQ
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- YTD
- 19.09%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $119.65M | $125.66M | $166.59M | |
| $113.22K | $106.22K | $200.22K |
GXTG vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | -1.28% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 19.09% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 8.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and AIQ is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GXTG and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (3 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
AIQ
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
GXTG
AIQ
Basic Materials
GXTG
AIQ
-
Utilities
GXTG
AIQ
-
Communication Services
GXTG
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
AIQ
Healthcare
GXTG
AIQ
Industrials
GXTG
AIQ
Real Estate
GXTG
AIQ
-
Financial Services
GXTG
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
AIQ
-
Energy
GXTG
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
AIQ
GXTG vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.24 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 1.96 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 5.85 | -6.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -44.66% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -20.19% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | -26.35% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -44.66% | -16.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -13.64% | -47.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.42% | -9.82% | -33.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.65% | 6.76% | +5.89% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) at 10.54%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 10.54% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.68% | 24.90% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.57% | 28.63% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 26.45% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 25.99% | +4.14% |
GXTG vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than AIQ's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.08% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.52% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and AIQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to AIQ (10.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 14.71% vs -13.00% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 14.71% return vs -13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.08% for AIQ.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while AIQ is Artificial Intelligence. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer