GXTG vs. AIQ
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -12.49%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for AIQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
GXTG vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 20.53% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- -4.72%
- 3Y*
- -4.61%
- 5Y*
- -12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 0.52% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 20.53% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 8.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and AIQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GXTG and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (3 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
AIQ
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
GXTG
AIQ
Basic Materials
GXTG
AIQ
-
Utilities
GXTG
AIQ
-
Communication Services
GXTG
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
AIQ
Healthcare
GXTG
AIQ
Industrials
GXTG
AIQ
Real Estate
GXTG
AIQ
-
Financial Services
GXTG
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
AIQ
-
Energy
GXTG
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
AIQ
GXTG vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 2.55 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 7.51 | -7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -44.66% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -16.47% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.97% | -26.35% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -44.66% | -16.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.27% | -12.60% | -47.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -9.78% | -33.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.26% | 5.58% | +5.68% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) is 11.81%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that GXTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 12.63% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.39% | 23.89% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.48% | 27.53% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.39% | 26.23% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 25.91% | +4.02% |
GXTG vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than AIQ's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.07% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.49% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and AIQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to GXTG (11.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 15.09% vs -12.49% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GXTG has been the lower-risk option at 11.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 15.09% return vs -12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.07% for AIQ.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer