GXTG vs. ARKK
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK. GXTG is passively managed, while ARKK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -13.00%/yr vs -9.57%/yr for ARKK. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKK.
Performance
GXTG vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's -4.39% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- -6.02%
- 3Y*
- -3.08%
- 5Y*
- -13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.26%
ARKK
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.78%
- 5Y*
- -9.57%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $370.97M | $374.79M | $521.18M | |
| $113.22K | $106.22K | $200.22K |
GXTG vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | -1.28% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | -4.39% | 35.49% | 8.40% | 69.04% | -66.97% | -23.60% | 152.71% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and ARKK is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GXTG and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
GXTG vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
ARKK
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
GXTG
ARKK
Basic Materials
GXTG
ARKK
-
Utilities
GXTG
ARKK
-
Communication Services
GXTG
ARKK
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
ARKK
Healthcare
GXTG
ARKK
Industrials
GXTG
ARKK
Real Estate
GXTG
ARKK
-
Financial Services
GXTG
ARKK
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
ARKK
-
Energy
GXTG
-
ARKK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
ARKK
GXTG vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.04 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.11 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 0.21 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and ARKK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -80.97% | +13.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -31.35% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | -39.56% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -76.27% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -52.38% | -8.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.42% | -30.39% | -13.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.65% | 15.61% | -2.96% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) at 10.89%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 10.89% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.68% | 27.68% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.57% | 36.62% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 46.59% | -17.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 40.50% | -10.37% |
GXTG vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.52% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and ARKK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to ARKK (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs ARKK's -80.97%.
On 5-year performance, ARKK leads with -9.57% vs -13.00% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ARKK has been the lower-risk option at 10.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ARKK has performed better with a -9.57% return vs -13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.75% for ARKK.
ARKK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and ARKK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer