IFLR vs. INKM
IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.
Performance
IFLR vs. INKM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLR achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than INKM's 6.55% return.
IFLR
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
INKM
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $761.70K | $614.46K | $734.84K | |
| $294.57K | $201.29K | $258.16K |
IFLR vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 7.58% | 3.03% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 6.55% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLR and INKM is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLR vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank
IFLR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INKM
IFLR vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLR | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLR vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLR drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLR and INKM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLR | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -28.58% | +19.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.45% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -3.66% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility
IFLR vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLR | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 6.01% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 8.31% | +4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 9.74% | +3.43% |
IFLR vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLR vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison
IFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than INKM's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 4.78% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLR and INKM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.
INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 0.93% for IFLR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for IFLR and 0.50% for INKM.
Find the right allocation for IFLR and INKM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer