GXTG vs. QQQ
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -7.87%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
GXTG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.30% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
GXTG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 25.21% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.70% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and QQQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between GXTG and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
QQQ
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
GXTG
QQQ
Basic Materials
GXTG
QQQ
Utilities
GXTG
QQQ
Communication Services
GXTG
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
QQQ
Healthcare
GXTG
QQQ
Industrials
GXTG
QQQ
Real Estate
GXTG
QQQ
Financial Services
GXTG
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
QQQ
Energy
GXTG
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
QQQ
GXTG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 3.51 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 13.49 | -11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.64 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.81 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.41 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -82.97% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -11.96% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.89% | -22.77% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -35.12% | -26.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -0.26% | -50.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -32.79% | -10.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 3.11% | +7.24% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 4.49% | +5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | 12.10% | +6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 15.94% | +9.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 22.38% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 22.29% | +7.30% |
GXTG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs -7.87% for GXTG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs -7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer