GXTG vs. VDC
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -12.49%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for VDC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
GXTG vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 9.72% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- -4.72%
- 3Y*
- -4.61%
- 5Y*
- -12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
VDC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
GXTG vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 0.52% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 9.72% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and VDC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GXTG and VDC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
VDC
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
GXTG
VDC
Basic Materials
GXTG
VDC
Utilities
GXTG
VDC
-
Communication Services
GXTG
VDC
-
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
VDC
Healthcare
GXTG
VDC
Industrials
GXTG
VDC
Real Estate
GXTG
VDC
-
Financial Services
GXTG
VDC
-
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
VDC
Energy
GXTG
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
VDC
GXTG vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.10 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.79 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 1.52 | -1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -34.24% | -33.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -9.28% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.97% | -11.78% | -18.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -16.55% | -44.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.27% | -5.09% | -55.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -3.74% | -39.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.26% | 4.81% | +6.45% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.91%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 4.91% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.39% | 10.64% | +12.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.48% | 13.11% | +16.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.39% | 13.29% | +15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 14.69% | +15.24% |
GXTG vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than VDC's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.49% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and VDC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to VDC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 5-year performance, VDC leads with 7.08% vs -12.49% for GXTG. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.08% return vs -12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.49% for GXTG.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.09% for VDC.
VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer