GXTG vs. VDC
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -13.00%/yr vs 7.22%/yr for VDC. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
GXTG vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 10.12% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- -6.02%
- 3Y*
- -3.08%
- 5Y*
- -13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.26%
VDC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 8.45%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $113.22K | $106.22K | $200.22K | |
| $36.35M | $34.41M | $38.20M |
GXTG vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | -1.28% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 10.12% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and VDC is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.25 |
The correlation between GXTG and VDC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
VDC
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
GXTG
VDC
Basic Materials
GXTG
VDC
Utilities
GXTG
VDC
-
Communication Services
GXTG
VDC
-
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
VDC
Healthcare
GXTG
VDC
Industrials
GXTG
VDC
Real Estate
GXTG
VDC
-
Financial Services
GXTG
VDC
-
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
VDC
Energy
GXTG
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
VDC
GXTG vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.11 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.91 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 1.71 | -2.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -34.24% | -33.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -9.28% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | -11.06% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -16.55% | -44.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -4.74% | -56.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.42% | -3.74% | -39.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.65% | 4.96% | +7.69% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 5.53%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 5.53% | +7.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.68% | 11.35% | +14.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.57% | 13.79% | +17.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 13.44% | +15.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 14.76% | +15.37% |
GXTG vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than VDC's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.52% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and VDC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to VDC (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 5-year performance, VDC leads with 7.22% vs -13.00% for GXTG. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.22% return vs -13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.52% for GXTG.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.09% for VDC.
VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer