GXTG vs. XLK
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -7.87%/yr vs 23.83%/yr for XLK. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
GXTG vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
GXTG vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 25.21% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.70% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and XLK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between GXTG and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
XLK
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Technology
GXTG
XLK
Basic Materials
GXTG
XLK
-
Utilities
GXTG
XLK
-
Communication Services
GXTG
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
XLK
-
Healthcare
GXTG
XLK
-
Industrials
GXTG
XLK
Real Estate
GXTG
XLK
-
Financial Services
GXTG
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
XLK
-
Energy
GXTG
-
XLK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
XLK
GXTG vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.52 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 4.22 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 14.16 | -12.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 3.24 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.96 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.42 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -82.05% | +14.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -15.92% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.89% | -25.66% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -33.56% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -1.00% | -49.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -34.96% | -8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 4.74% | +5.61% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 6.98% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | 16.68% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 20.82% | +4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 24.90% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 24.49% | +5.10% |
GXTG vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and XLK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.83% vs -7.87% for GXTG. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.83% return vs -7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer