GXTG vs. XLK
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -13.00%/yr vs 19.12%/yr for XLK. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
GXTG vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 23.97% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- -6.02%
- 3Y*
- -3.08%
- 5Y*
- -13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.26%
XLK
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- YTD
- 23.97%
- 1Y
- 39.24%
- 3Y*
- 28.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.12%
- 10Y*
- 23.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $113.22K | $106.22K | $200.22K | |
| $1.65B | $1.63B | $2.23B |
GXTG vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | -1.28% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 23.97% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and XLK is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between GXTG and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
XLK
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Technology
GXTG
XLK
Basic Materials
GXTG
XLK
-
Utilities
GXTG
XLK
-
Communication Services
GXTG
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
XLK
-
Healthcare
GXTG
XLK
-
Industrials
GXTG
XLK
Real Estate
GXTG
XLK
-
Financial Services
GXTG
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
XLK
-
Energy
GXTG
-
XLK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
XLK
GXTG vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.26 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 2.48 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 6.68 | -7.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -82.05% | +14.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -15.92% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | -25.66% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -33.56% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -10.07% | -50.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.42% | -34.80% | -8.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.65% | 5.89% | +6.76% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 9.37%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 9.37% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.68% | 21.74% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.57% | 25.56% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 25.77% | +2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 24.91% | +5.22% |
GXTG vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.52% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and XLK have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to XLK (9.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 19.12% vs -13.00% for GXTG. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 9.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 19.12% return vs -13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer