PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDVZ vs. LRNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IDVZ
Opal International Dividend Income ETF
6.35%33.14%-1.61%
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
-16.03%22.27%-2.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVZ achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly higher than LRNZ's -16.03% return.


IDVZ

1D
2.06%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
6.35%
6M
10.47%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LRNZ

1D
4.82%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-16.03%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
-0.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDVZ vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVZ
IDVZ Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IDVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LRNZ
LRNZ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LRNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LRNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDVZLRNZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

0.50

+1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

0.94

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.12

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

0.53

+2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

1.46

+9.13

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the LRNZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVZ and LRNZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDVZLRNZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.50

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.09

0.21

+1.88

Correlation

The correlation between IDVZ and LRNZ is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

IDVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
IDVZ
Opal International Dividend Income ETF
2.83%2.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.13%

Drawdowns

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVZ drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVZ and LRNZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVZLRNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-61.33%

+50.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-26.89%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-27.31%

+21.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-27.04%

+25.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

9.70%

-7.23%

Volatility

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) is 6.32%, while TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IDVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDVZLRNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

9.50%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

21.64%

-12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

32.87%

-18.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

37.17%

-22.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

37.69%

-22.99%