IDVZ vs. LRNZ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IDVZ (Polen International Dividend Income ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDVZ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while LRNZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by TrueShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IDVZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IDVZ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 1.95%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 11.94%
• 1Y: 26.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.08%

LRNZ

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IDVZ Polen International Dividend Income ETF	$667.67K	$1.41M	$1.02M
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	$103.68K	$133.76K	$133.76K

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IDVZ Polen International Dividend Income ETF	2.04%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVZ and LRNZ is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	0.16

Return for Risk

IDVZ vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDVZ

IDVZ Risk / Return Rank: 85
IDVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IDVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IDVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
IDVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IDVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 82

LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDVZ	LRNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.00	—	—

Drawdowns

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVZ drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVZ and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDVZ	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.99%	-11.91%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-6.20%	+5.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-5.75%	+4.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IDVZ	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.28%	34.30%	-22.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.26%	34.30%	-20.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.26%	34.30%	-20.04%

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDVZ vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

IDVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IDVZ Polen International Dividend Income ETF	2.86%	2.88%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDVZ and LRNZ in my portfolio?

IDVZ and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IDVZ or LRNZ?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDVZ or LRNZ?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IDVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDVZ or LRNZ?

IDVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between IDVZ and LRNZ?

IDVZ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LRNZ is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Polen and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IDVZ and 0.68% for LRNZ.