IDVZ vs. IMTM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IDVZ (Opal International Dividend Income ETF) and IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDVZ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while IMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Momentum. IDVZ is actively managed, while IMTM is passively managed. Over the past year, IDVZ returned 23.30% vs 23.92% for IMTM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDVZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IMTM.

Performance

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IDVZ having a 10.79% return and IMTM slightly higher at 11.05%.

IDVZ

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 13.37%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMTM

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 11.05%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 23.92%
• 3Y*: 21.55%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IDVZ Opal International Dividend Income ETF	10.79%	33.14%	-1.61%
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	11.05%	34.50%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVZ and IMTM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024	0.78

The correlation between IDVZ and IMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IDVZ vs. IMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVZ

IDVZ Risk / Return Rank: 56
IDVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
IDVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
IDVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IDVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IDVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

IMTM

IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 40
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDVZ	IMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.41	+0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.07	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	1.87	+0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.50	7.46	+3.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the IMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVZ and IMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDVZ	IMTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	1.41	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.09	0.50	+1.58

Drawdowns

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVZ drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum IMTM drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVZ and IMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDVZ	IMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.99%	-32.66%	+21.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-12.85%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-0.39%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-7.45%	+6.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	3.21%	-0.88%

Volatility

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) is 3.89%, while iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that IDVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDVZ	IMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	5.48%	-1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.56%	14.98%	-5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.93%	17.04%	-5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.47%	17.64%	-3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.47%	17.64%	-3.17%

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDVZ vs. IMTM - Dividend Comparison

IDVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than IMTM's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDVZ Opal International Dividend Income ETF	2.73%	2.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	4.23%	4.70%	2.93%	2.29%	2.68%	2.51%	0.97%	2.13%	2.36%	1.92%	2.75%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDVZ and IMTM in my portfolio?

IDVZ and IMTM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDVZ or IMTM?

IMTM has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to IDVZ (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVZ dropped -10.99% vs IMTM's -32.66%.

Which ETF is better, IDVZ or IMTM?

On 1-year performance, IMTM leads with 23.92% vs 23.30% for IDVZ. On fees, IMTM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IDVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDVZ or IMTM?

Over the 1-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 23.92% return vs 23.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDVZ or IMTM?

IMTM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IDVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDVZ or IMTM?

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.73% for IDVZ.

What is the main difference between IDVZ and IMTM?

IDVZ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IMTM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IDVZ and 0.30% for IMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.