ICLN vs. HUBS
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 11.67%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for HUBS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ICLN vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 27.33% return, which is significantly higher than HUBS's -53.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed HUBS with an annualized return of 11.67%, while HUBS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.
ICLN
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.01%
- 1Y
- 60.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
HUBS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -53.16%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -66.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
ICLN vs. HUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 27.33% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -53.16% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and HUBS is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ICLN and HUBS shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. HUBS — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
HUBS
ICLN vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.77 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | -0.99 | +4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | -1.66 | +15.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than HUBS's maximum drawdown of -78.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and HUBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -78.99% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | -68.09% | +51.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.18% | -78.16% | +34.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -78.99% | +21.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | -78.99% | +12.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.03% | -77.94% | +34.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.56% | -23.21% | -43.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 40.95% | -36.54% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is 12.97%, while HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a volatility of 27.45%. This indicates that ICLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.97% | 27.45% | -14.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.62% | 55.03% | -32.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.21% | 62.97% | -34.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 55.02% | -27.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 50.98% | -23.66% |
Dividends
ICLN vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and HUBS have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to ICLN (12.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLN dropped -87.15% vs HUBS's -78.99%.
ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and HUBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer