ICLN vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
ICLN and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both ICLN and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICLN or LIT.
Performance
ICLN vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a -21.84% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's -13.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 3.75%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.69% annualized return.
ICLN
-21.84%
-10.77%
-14.06%
-11.76%
3.50%
3.75%
LIT
-13.36%
2.45%
-3.64%
-7.92%
12.28%
7.69%
Key characteristics
| ICLN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.51 | -0.34 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.59 | -0.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.19 | -0.18 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.16 | -0.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.01% | 18.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.91% | 33.03% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.16% | -62.61% |
| Current Drawdown | -68.02% | -53.16% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICLN vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and LIT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICLN vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICLN vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than LIT's 1.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.81% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 1.39% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.16%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICLN vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is 9.46%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that ICLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.