ICLN vs. CNRG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG).
ICLN and CNRG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. CNRG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. Both ICLN and CNRG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICLN or CNRG.
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and CNRG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ICLN vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ICLN:
-1.05
CNRG:
-0.52
ICLN:
-1.43
CNRG:
-0.58
ICLN:
0.84
CNRG:
0.94
ICLN:
-0.36
CNRG:
-0.27
ICLN:
-1.93
CNRG:
-1.16
ICLN:
12.95%
CNRG:
13.79%
ICLN:
23.85%
CNRG:
30.68%
ICLN:
-87.15%
CNRG:
-59.60%
ICLN:
-69.65%
CNRG:
-57.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a -25.91% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's -16.44% return.
ICLN
-25.91%
-4.97%
-17.84%
-22.53%
0.66%
3.52%
CNRG
-16.44%
-2.58%
-6.78%
-12.69%
8.32%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICLN vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICLN vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICLN vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than CNRG's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.22% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than CNRG's maximum drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICLN vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is 5.49%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that ICLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.