HOOG vs. QLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).

HOOG and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HOOG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006.

Performance

HOOG vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HOOG vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-68.49%	291.44%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	-13.35%	50.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -68.49% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's -13.35% return.

HOOG

• 1D: 12.50%
• 1M: -20.36%
• YTD: -68.49%
• 6M: -83.51%
• 1Y: 42.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: 6.72%
• 1M: -10.26%
• YTD: -13.35%
• 6M: -11.03%
• 1Y: 37.53%
• 3Y*: 35.41%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: 29.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

QLD

ProShares Ultra QQQ

HOOG

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

Return for Risk

HOOG vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 34
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 57
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HOOG	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.84	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.43	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.20	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	1.49	-1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	4.88	-3.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HOOG vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOOG	QLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.84	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.53	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and QLD is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HOOG vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.05%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	39.05%	12.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.19%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOG	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.94%	-83.13%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.94%	-25.13%	-61.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.30%	-20.10%	-65.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.96%	-18.30%	-11.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.02%	7.67%	+33.35%

Volatility

HOOG vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 35.72% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 12.96%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOG	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.72%	12.96%	+22.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.26%	25.55%	+75.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	143.11%	44.91%	+98.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.89%	44.77%	+99.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.89%	44.47%	+99.42%