HOOG vs. BMNU
HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HOOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BMNU.
Performance
HOOG vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -57.66% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -78.43% return.
HOOG
- 1D
- 8.54%
- 1M
- -38.97%
- 6M
- -30.19%
- YTD
- -57.66%
- 1Y
- -58.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 52.34%
BMNU
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 33.84%
- 6M
- -65.52%
- YTD
- -78.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.51M | $39.93M | $115.00M | |
| $10.21M | $12.99M | $16.66M |
HOOG vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -57.66% | -29.82% |
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -78.43% | -80.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOG and BMNU is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOG vs. BMNU — Risk / Return Rank
HOOG
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HOOG vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOG | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOG vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and BMNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOG | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.94% | -98.29% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.25% | -97.37% | +17.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.84% | -82.77% | +40.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.03% | — | — |
Volatility
HOOG vs. BMNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOG | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.66% | 183.03% | -42.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.00% | 183.03% | -39.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.00% | 183.03% | -39.03% |
HOOG vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOG vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison
HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.06%, while BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 29.06% | 12.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOG and BMNU have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 29.06%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 1.50% for BMNU.
Find the right allocation for HOOG and BMNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer