HOOG vs. BMNU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU).

HOOG and BMNU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HOOG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025. BMNU is an actively managed fund by REX. It was launched on Sep 26, 2025.

Performance

HOOG vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HOOG vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-67.70%	-28.74%
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF	-63.39%	-81.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -67.70% return, which is significantly lower than BMNU's -63.39% return.

HOOG

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: -24.23%
• YTD: -67.70%
• 6M: -82.07%
• 1Y: 43.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNU

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -15.87%
• YTD: -63.39%
• 6M: -93.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.

BMNU

T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF

HOOG

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

Return for Risk

HOOG vs. BMNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 32
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HOOG	BMNU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.11	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOOG	BMNU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	-0.48	+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and BMNU is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HOOG vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.10%, while BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	38.10%	12.30%
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -96.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and BMNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOG	BMNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.94%	-96.12%	+9.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.94%	-95.53%	+10.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.17%	-74.48%	+44.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOOG	BMNU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	100.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	143.11%	206.24%	-63.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.62%	206.24%	-62.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.62%	206.24%	-62.62%