HOOG vs. PTIR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HOOG is actively managed, while PTIR is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOG returned -61.45% vs -56.45% for PTIR. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HOOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.

Performance

HOOG vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HOOG having a -60.99% return and PTIR slightly lower at -62.18%.

HOOG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -43.77%
• 6M: -47.78%
• YTD: -60.99%
• 1Y: -61.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.80%

PTIR

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -11.63%
• 6M: -43.20%
• YTD: -62.18%
• 1Y: -56.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 164.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	$9.83M	$14.42M	$16.77M
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	$34.43M	$50.90M	$65.92M

HOOG vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-60.99%	320.19%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-62.18%	192.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and PTIR is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.55

The correlation between HOOG and PTIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HOOG vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 6
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 4
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOOG vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOG	PTIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	-0.56	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.04	-0.43	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.95	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.74	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	-1.21	+0.16

HOOG vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is comparable to the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and PTIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, which is greater than PTIR's maximum drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and PTIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOG	PTIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.94%	-79.40%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.94%	-79.40%	-7.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.80%	-73.93%	-7.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.73%	-31.05%	-10.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.82%	48.56%	+12.26%

Volatility

HOOG vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 35.80% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) at 27.36%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOG	PTIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.80%	27.36%	+8.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	107.69%	81.50%	+26.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.37%	104.45%	+35.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.04%	127.66%	+16.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.04%	127.66%	+16.38%

HOOG vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOG vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.54%, more than PTIR's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	31.54%	12.30%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	15.36%	5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOG and PTIR in my portfolio?

HOOG and PTIR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOG or PTIR?

HOOG has higher volatility (35.80%) compared to PTIR (27.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs PTIR's -79.40%.

Which ETF is better, HOOG or PTIR?

On 1-year performance, PTIR leads with -56.45% vs -61.45% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PTIR has been the lower-risk option at 27.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOG or PTIR?

Over the 1-year period, PTIR has performed better with a -56.45% return vs -61.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOG or PTIR?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOG or PTIR?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.54%, compared with 15.36% for PTIR.

What is the main difference between HOOG and PTIR?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 1.04% for PTIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.