HOOG vs. QQQ
HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. HOOG is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOG returned -61.45% vs 24.81% for QQQ. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HOOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
HOOG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -60.99% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return.
HOOG
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -43.77%
- 6M
- -47.78%
- YTD
- -60.99%
- 1Y
- -61.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.80%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.83M | $14.42M | $16.77M | |
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B |
HOOG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -60.99% | 320.19% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 28.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOG and QQQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HOOG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
HOOG
QQQ
HOOG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.21 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.88 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 6.00 | -7.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.94% | -82.97% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.94% | -11.96% | -74.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.80% | -7.69% | -74.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.73% | -32.62% | -9.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.82% | 3.74% | +57.08% |
Volatility
HOOG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 35.80% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.80% | 6.87% | +28.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.69% | 16.08% | +91.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.37% | 19.38% | +120.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.04% | 22.90% | +121.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.04% | 22.50% | +121.54% |
HOOG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.54%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 31.54% | 12.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOG has higher volatility (35.80%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 24.81% vs -61.45% for HOOG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 24.81% return vs -61.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HOOG.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.54%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.
HOOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer