PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOG vs. HOOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOG vs. HOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HOOG having a -37.65% return and HOOX slightly lower at -38.37%.


HOOG

1D
-4.37%
1M
92.50%
YTD
-37.65%
6M
-47.26%
1Y
-5.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOX

1D
-4.82%
1M
92.25%
YTD
-38.37%
6M
-47.93%
1Y
-8.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. HOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and HOOX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

1.00

The correlation between HOOG and HOOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOG vs. HOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. HOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOGHOOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

-0.10

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

-0.15

+0.04

HOOG vs. HOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is comparable to the HOOX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and HOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. HOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOX drawdown of -87.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and HOOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOGHOOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

-87.11%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

-87.11%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.92%

-71.47%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.94%

-38.85%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.79%

56.02%

-0.23%

Volatility

HOOG vs. HOOX - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) have volatilities of 46.00% and 46.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOGHOOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.00%

46.24%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.86%

102.28%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.56%

140.06%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.89%

144.13%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.89%

144.13%

+0.76%

HOOG vs. HOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOG vs. HOOX - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.73%, less than HOOX's 22.91% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, HOOG and HOOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HOOX has higher volatility (46.24%) compared to HOOG (46.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs HOOX's -87.11%.

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -5.85% vs -8.27% for HOOX. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HOOG has been the lower-risk option at 46.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -5.85% return vs -8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 22.91%, compared with 19.73% for HOOG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 1.31% for HOOX.

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOG and HOOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer