HDV vs. FVD
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.31%/yr vs 8.54%/yr for FVD. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FVD.
Performance
HDV vs. FVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 3.30% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed FVD with an annualized return of 9.31%, while FVD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.54% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
FVD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
HDV vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.57% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 3.30% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -3.49% | 12.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and FVD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.87 |
The correlation between HDV and FVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDV vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
FVD
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
FVD
Healthcare
HDV
FVD
Energy
HDV
FVD
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
FVD
Utilities
HDV
FVD
Communication Services
HDV
FVD
Financial Services
HDV
FVD
Industrials
HDV
FVD
Basic Materials
HDV
FVD
Technology
HDV
FVD
Real Estate
HDV
-
FVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
FVD
HDV vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 1.37 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 3.52 | +6.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and FVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -51.00% | +13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -7.23% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -11.97% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -16.41% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -35.25% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -4.95% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -5.44% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.80% | -0.91% |
Volatility
HDV vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 3.12%. This indicates that HDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.12% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 7.05% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 9.73% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 12.76% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 15.46% | +0.28% |
HDV vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than FVD's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.29% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.94% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and FVD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to FVD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs FVD's -51.00%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.31% vs 8.54% for FVD. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 2.29% for FVD.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while FVD is Mid Cap Value Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.61% for FVD.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and FVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer