HAL vs. CROX
HAL (Halliburton Company) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, HAL returned 1.02%/yr vs 27.39%/yr for CROX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAL vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 44.62% return, which is significantly higher than CROX's 41.08% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 1.02%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.39% annualized return.
HAL
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 44.62%
- 6M
- 45.55%
- 1Y
- 101.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
CROX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 16.42%
- YTD
- 41.08%
- 6M
- 39.95%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 1.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 27.39%
HAL vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 44.62% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 41.08% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and CROX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2006 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HAL and CROX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HAL:
$33.98B
CROX:
$6.12B
HAL:
$1.82
CROX:
-$1.94
HAL:
1.55
CROX:
1.60
HAL:
3.14
CROX:
4.29
HAL:
$22.17B
CROX:
$4.02B
HAL:
$3.40B
CROX:
$2.34B
HAL:
$3.83B
CROX:
$297.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAL vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
HAL
CROX
HAL vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAL | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.13 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.82 | 0.58 | +7.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.24 | 0.99 | +19.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAL | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 0.36 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.05 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.49 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.17 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
HAL vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAL | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.99% | -98.74% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -32.54% | +19.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.01% | -54.04% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.01% | -73.86% | +19.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.45% | -75.18% | -16.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.36% | -33.18% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.13% | -61.28% | +22.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 19.17% | -14.11% |
Volatility
HAL vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Halliburton Company (HAL) is 10.08%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that HAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAL | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 11.01% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.20% | 31.82% | -7.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 52.52% | -15.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.19% | 55.12% | -14.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.98% | 55.96% | -9.98% |
Dividends
HAL vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.68% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
HAL vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HAL vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HAL and CROX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CROX has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to HAL (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAL dropped -92.99% vs CROX's -98.74%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAL and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer