HAL vs. SLB
Compare and contrast key facts about Halliburton Company (HAL) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAL or SLB.
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and SLB is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HAL vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HAL:
-0.84
SLB:
-0.44
HAL:
-1.07
SLB:
-0.47
HAL:
0.87
SLB:
0.94
HAL:
-0.40
SLB:
-0.20
HAL:
-1.03
SLB:
-0.62
HAL:
23.06%
SLB:
18.95%
HAL:
28.31%
SLB:
26.59%
HAL:
-92.99%
SLB:
-87.63%
HAL:
-57.15%
SLB:
-52.53%
Fundamentals
HAL:
$22.80B
SLB:
$56.76B
HAL:
$2.83
SLB:
$3.11
HAL:
9.28
SLB:
13.42
HAL:
1.76
SLB:
1.95
HAL:
$22.94B
SLB:
$36.30B
HAL:
$4.30B
SLB:
$7.39B
HAL:
$4.79B
SLB:
$7.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of -3.22%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -4.26% annualized return.
HAL
-3.42%
-6.11%
-16.40%
-23.84%
7.52%
-3.22%
SLB
9.63%
0.00%
-5.64%
-12.24%
8.41%
-4.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAL vs. SLB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HAL
SLB
HAL vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HAL vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than SLB's 2.66% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 2.59% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% | 1.60% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.66% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 1.67% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
HAL vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than SLB's maximum drawdown of -87.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and SLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HAL vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
Halliburton Company (HAL) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Schlumberger Limited (SLB) at 7.09%. This indicates that HAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HAL vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities