HAL vs. SLB

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HAL having a -15.43% return and SLB slightly lower at -15.47%. Over the past 10 years, HAL has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of -3.06%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -5.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is comparable to the SLB Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL and SLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than SLB's 2.49% yield.

The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than SLB's maximum drawdown of -87.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and SLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Halliburton Company (HAL) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB) have volatilities of 9.17% and 9.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.