PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAL vs. BKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HAL vs. BKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Halliburton Company (HAL) and Baker Hughes Company (BKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 25.59% return, which is significantly lower than BKR's 30.81% return.


HAL

1D
0.69%
1M
-14.83%
YTD
25.59%
6M
25.90%
1Y
61.52%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
-0.29%

BKR

1D
1.27%
1M
-10.46%
YTD
30.81%
6M
30.75%
1Y
54.28%
3Y*
28.47%
5Y*
23.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAL vs. BKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAL
Halliburton Company
25.59%7.02%-23.19%-6.47%74.45%21.99%-21.23%-4.90%-44.63%12.76%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
30.81%13.39%23.11%18.58%25.96%19.03%-15.15%23.01%-30.43%-21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HAL and BKR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.70

The correlation between HAL and BKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HAL:

$29.51B

BKR:

$58.91B

EPS

HAL:

$1.82

BKR:

$3.14

PE Ratio

HAL:

19.36

BKR:

18.85

PEG Ratio

HAL:

3.09

BKR:

0.10

PS Ratio

HAL:

1.34

BKR:

2.11

PB Ratio

HAL:

2.73

BKR:

2.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

HAL:

$22.17B

BKR:

$27.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HAL:

$3.40B

BKR:

$6.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

HAL:

$3.83B

BKR:

$4.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAL vs. BKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAL
HAL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BKR
BKR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAL vs. BKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Baker Hughes Company (BKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HALBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.24

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

9.21

+2.94

HAL vs. BKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the BKR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL and BKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAL vs. BKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than BKR's maximum drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and BKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HALBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.99%

-75.38%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-16.86%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.01%

-28.00%

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.01%

-46.53%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.39%

-14.82%

-25.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-24.63%

-14.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

5.92%

-0.69%

Volatility

HAL vs. BKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Halliburton Company (HAL) is 10.16%, while Baker Hughes Company (BKR) has a volatility of 11.04%. This indicates that HAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HALBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.16%

11.04%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

24.82%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.86%

33.41%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.09%

34.92%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.01%

40.18%

+5.83%

Dividends

HAL vs. BKR - Dividend Comparison

HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than BKR's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
1.56%2.02%2.05%2.28%2.47%2.99%3.45%2.81%3.35%56.42%0.00%0.00%
HAL
Halliburton Company
1.93%2.41%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%

Financials

HAL vs. BKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Baker Hughes Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
5.40B
6.59B
(HAL) Total Revenue
(BKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HAL vs. BKR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Halliburton Company and Baker Hughes Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%20222023202420252026
14.6%
22.8%
Portfolio components
HAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.

BKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 6.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

HAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

BKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported an operating income of 809.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

HAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.

BKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a net income of 930.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HAL and BKR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKR has higher volatility (11.04%) compared to HAL (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAL dropped -92.99% vs BKR's -75.38%.

HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAL and BKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer